Trust Restored
LeadREFACE LITHUANIA UAB released BitePal version 2.13.1 in May 2026, introducing a manual calorie adjustment tool that successfully reversed widespread scam allegations and salvaged user trust.
Manual Editing Added
Release SummaryWhile the official App Store release notes vaguely described the update as "just tuning, cleaning, and smoothing", version 2.13.1 delivered a critical functional overhaul.[1] The update allows users to manually edit the calories and macronutrients of AI-scanned foods.
Before this release, the rigid AI frequently miscalculated complex meals, rendering the tracker useless for precise dieting. According to a 3-star reviewer on version 2.13.1, the update also introduced an aggressive forced review prompt early in the onboarding flow, which appears designed to capture positive sentiment from the improved experience.
Before this release, the rigid AI frequently miscalculated complex meals, rendering the tracker useless for precise dieting. According to a 3-star reviewer on version 2.13.1, the update also introduced an aggressive forced review prompt early in the onboarding flow, which appears designed to capture positive sentiment from the improved experience.
Ratings Rebound
User ReceptionThe average for reviews of v2.13.1 climbed to 4.03 stars, a 1.74-star increase over the 2.29-star average for v2.13.0.[2] Prior to version 2.13.1, users expressed severe frustration with the rigid AI. A 1-star reviewer on version 2.13.0 stated, "The app is extremely inaccurate and I asked for a refund... Seems like a scam to me."
Post-update feedback shows a stark shift in perception. A 5-star reviewer on version 2.13.1 noted, "Look I’m from the hood, in Baltimore This ain’t no scam! I lost 30lbs from this app." Another 4-star user praised the newfound flexibility, stating that when the AI miscalculates, they "just change it so that’s nice too."
Post-update feedback shows a stark shift in perception. A 5-star reviewer on version 2.13.1 noted, "Look I’m from the hood, in Baltimore This ain’t no scam! I lost 30lbs from this app." Another 4-star user praised the newfound flexibility, stating that when the AI miscalculates, they "just change it so that’s nice too."
Escaping Scam Status
Root CauseThe developer likely shipped the manual override to stop a flood of negative reviews driven by the AI's inherent inaccuracies. Users felt trapped paying for a tool that provided incorrect nutritional data. By allowing manual corrections, REFACE LITHUANIA UAB restored the app's core utility.
A thread on r/weightwatchers previously highlighted aggressive billing practices, including confusing duplicate subscriptions, which fueled the "scam" narrative. Archived.
A thread on r/weightwatchers previously highlighted aggressive billing practices, including confusing duplicate subscriptions, which fueled the "scam" narrative. Archived.
Protecting Acquisition
Market ImpactBitePal maintains a massive footprint, securing over 516k downloads on the US iOS App Store over the last 30 days. The dramatic rating recovery likely lowers user acquisition costs and improves the app's conversion rate. By addressing the functional complaints that drove refund requests, the publisher appears to have stabilized its revenue stream. These figures compare the 76 US App Store reviews tagged with v2.13.0 against the 78 tagged with v2.13.1, measured on 2026-05-06.
Health Sync Wanted
Expert VerdictThe improved 4.03-star average for v2.13.1 reviews will likely boost BitePal's organic visibility in the short term. However, the developer may need to prioritize Apple Health and fitness syncing in upcoming releases, as users consistently request the ability to track burned calories alongside food intake.[4] Furthermore, if the forced review prompt remains too aggressive, it could trigger a secondary backlash from users who resent the early interruption.