Market intelligence

Brigit: Cash Advance & Credit v1158.0 forces premium subscription for advances in June 2026

Brigit's June 2026 update, version 1158.0, has triggered a severe user backlash by enforcing a mandatory paid subscription for its core cash advance feature. The change caused the app's rating to fall sharply, fueling complaints over new fees and historically low advance limits.

3 min read
Brigit's update now requires users to sign up for a premium membership to receive cash advances, even for small amounts, or to continue using the service.
Brigit: Cash Advance & Credit
On this page
  1. Update Backlash
  2. Subscription Paywall
  3. Forced Subscription
  4. Stagnant Limits
  5. FTC Settlement Context
  6. Expert Verdict

Key takeaways

  1. 01Brigit's v1158.0 update caused its average rating to drop from 3.63 to 2.74 stars after its release on June 6, 2026.
  2. 02The primary cause of the backlash is the enforcement of a mandatory paid subscription, costing $8.99 to $14.99 per month, to access any cash advance.
  3. 03User frustration is compounded by long-standing complaints of low and stagnant advance limits, often far below the advertised $250 maximum.
  4. 04This policy change appears linked to a November 2023 FTC settlement where Brigit's parent company paid $18 million over deceptive marketing and subscription practices.
  5. 05With nearly 235,000 downloads in the last 30 days, the update affects a large and financially sensitive user base.

Update BacklashLead

Bridge It Inc.'s version 1158.0 update for Brigit: Cash Advance & Credit now requires a premium membership for cash advances, causing the app's average rating1]verage users give your app on the App Store and Google Play — a primary ranking signal and one of the biggest conversion drivers on your product page. to drop from 3.63 to 2.74 stars.

Subscription PaywallRelease Summary

The update, released on June 6, 2026, appears to have removed any exceptions that previously allowed users to access cash advances without a subscription2] they cancel.. Access to the app's core feature is now strictly gated behind a "Plus" ($8.99/mo) or "Premium" ($14.99/mo) membership. These fees are charged regardless of whether a user takes an advance.

While official release notes for v1158.0 were not published, user reports confirm the change, transforming what many saw as a flexible service into a rigid, fee-based system.

Forced SubscriptionBreaking Changes

The reaction from users was immediate. Post-update reviews focus on the newly enforced subscription. As one 1-star reviewer on version 1158.0 wrote, "Not recognizable — I had to sign up for premium just to get $50. So I cancelled and went back to the free version and it is still going to charge me $14.99... but no increase in advance amount."

This sentiment reflects a user base caught off guard by the change, which effectively breaks the app's primary function for non-paying users. The app received over 50 new reviews since the update, with the majority being negative.

Stagnant LimitsUser Reception

The mandatory fee amplifies a long-standing complaint: low and stagnant advance amounts. While Brigit advertises advances up to $250, reports indicate the typical amount is closer to $50-$100, with an average of just $73. A user on v1158.0 noted, "I use a few different apps. Brigit has the lowest amount that I can pull out... Been at $65 for a year. Not worth taking."

This frustration is a persistent theme. Users on Reddit communities for cash advance apps frequently report being stuck at low limits for years, despite consistent repayment history.

FTC Settlement ContextRoot Cause

The update's enforcement of a clear paywall is likely a direct consequence of a November 2023 settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Brigit's parent company, Bridge It Inc., agreed to an $18 million settlement over allegations of deceptive marketing and trapping users in subscriptions [3]that were difficult to cancel.

The FTC alleged the company promised "instant" advances up to $250 that only about 1% of customers received. This update, while alienating users, appears to be an attempt to comply with the FTC's order by making its subscription model explicit and unavoidable.

Expert VerdictExpert Verdict

Brigit now faces a difficult challenge: balancing regulatory compliance with user retention. The clumsy implementation of a strict paywall has damaged trust with its user base, which includes nearly 235,000 monthly iOS users in the US, many of whom are financially sensitive.

This move suggests a pivot to a more transparent, if less popular, revenue model to avoid further regulatory action. However, the resulting user churn may create an opening for competitors like EarnIn or Dave to attract disenfranchised Brigit customers. The friction between the app's business model and user expectations is likely to continue.

Citations

  1. [1]

    Brigit's v1158.0 update caused the app's average rating to fall from 3.63 to 2.74 stars.

    "The June 6, 2026 update of Brigit: Cash Advance & Credit (version 1158.0) triggered a significant negative shift in user sentiment, causing the app's average rating to plummet from 3.63 to 2.74 stars."
  2. [2]

    Access to cash advances is now gated behind a 'Plus' ($8.99/mo) or 'Premium' ($14.99/mo) membership.

    "The "smoking gun" identified from user reviews is that cash advances of any amount, which some users may have previously accessed under different terms, are now strictly gated behind a "Plus" ($8.99/mo) or "Premium" ($14.99/mo) membership."
  3. [3]

    In November 2023, Brigit's parent company agreed to an $18 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over deceptive marketing.

    "Brigit's parent company, Bridge It Inc., agreed to an $18 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in November 2023."
    InstitutionalFtcftc.gov

Sources

14 references

Maxime Doussin, CTO at MWM

Maxime Doussin

CTO

Maxime Doussin is the CTO of MWM, where he leads engineering, data infrastructure, and the mobile-app market-intelligence platform. He writes MWM's weekly app trend analysis, drawing on proprietary ranking data covering millions of iOS and Android apps across 150+ countries.

This article is an independent editorial analysis. App names, trademarks, and brands mentioned are the property of their respective owners. Market data and rankings referenced are based on MWM's proprietary estimates.

Believe this article infringes your intellectual property? File a dispute