Market intelligence

Grok - AI Chat & Video v1.3.66 forces privacy policy agreement, blocks account deletion, April 2026

Grok - AI Chat & Video's version 1.3.66 update, released April 21, 2026, sparked a user backlash over a perceived forced privacy policy agreement. The app's rating fell from 3.74 to 2.4 stars. While analysis refutes the claim that account deletion is blocked, it confirms user data cannot be retroactively removed from AI training models.

3 min read
New privacy policy forces user agreement and prevents account deletion if not accepted.
Grok - AI Chat & Video
On this page
  1. Update Backlash
  2. Vague Changelog
  3. User Reception
  4. The Deletion Myth
  5. Market Impact
  6. Verdict

Key takeaways

  1. 01Grok v1.3.66, released April 21, 2026, caused the app's rating to drop 1.34 stars to 2.4.
  2. 02Users reported being unable to delete their accounts without first agreeing to a new privacy policy.
  3. 03Independent analysis from PCMag and Anonyome Labs refutes this, confirming account deletion is possible but that user data cannot be extracted from trained AI models.
  4. 04The app saw over 3.35 million downloads in the last 30 days, amplifying the update's impact.
  5. 05Forbes reported Grok's daily active mobile users fell 12.5% globally from March to April 2026 amid privacy and paywall controversies.

Update BacklashLead

X Corp.’s Grok - AI Chat & Video version 1.3.66, released on April 21, 2026, triggered a sharp user backlash over a new privacy policy.[1] The update resulted in the app's average rating dropping from 3.74 to 2.4 stars.

Vague ChangelogRelease Summary

The official App Store release notes for v1.3.66 described the update with a generic statement: "Improvements to Chat, Voice and Imagine." This release follows a March 2026 update that paywalled core features, but the April 21 build introduced a distinct controversy focused on data retention and privacy controls, not monetization.

The update arrived as parent company xAI faced significant regulatory pressure over AI-generated content and its data handling practices, setting the stage for heightened user sensitivity to any changes in terms of service.

User ReceptionUser Reception

The core of the user backlash centers on the belief that the app now forces agreement to a new privacy policy to permit account deletion.[2] One 1-star reviewer on v1.3.66 stated, "If you don’t agree with the new privacy policies you will not be allowed to delete your account. They force you to agree to delete if you don’t agree." This sentiment captures the primary frustration seen in post-update reviews, shifting the conversation from feature complaints to data rights concerns. Other users continued to lament previously paywalled features, with one review noting, "Elon took all the fun away from free."

The Deletion MythRoot Cause

Independent analysis refutes the claim that account deletion is blocked. A report from PCMag outlines the standard procedure to opt out of AI training and delete conversation history, confirming that deletion is not conditional on a policy agreement. However, the underlying user fear is rooted in a technical reality. A privacy analysis by Anonyome Labs clarifies that while users can delete their accounts, "deleting your X account does not delete the data from the AI model." This means any data already used for training cannot be retroactively removed, a critical distinction lost on many users.[4]

Market ImpactMarket Impact

The update's fallout coincides with a measurable drop in user engagement. According to data from Forbes, Grok's average daily active users3]ndar day. The most-watched daily engagement signal in mobile apps. on mobile apps fell 12.5% worldwide between March and April 2026, from 13.9 million to 12.2 million. This happened as rivals like Claude and Gemini gained ground.

With over 3.35 million US iOS downloads in the last 30 days, the negative sentiment shift affects a substantial user base and poses a threat to Grok's market position.

VerdictExpert Verdict

The v1.3.66 update appears to be a misstep in user communication rather than a malicious policy change. The user perception of being trapped is a reaction to standard compliance language combined with the unsettling nature of permanent AI data training. While the claim of blocked account deletion is factually incorrect, the damage to user trust is real and measurable.

Moving forward, xAI faces the difficult task of rebuilding confidence. The company must improve transparency around its data retention policies or risk continued user attrition and further regulatory scrutiny, especially in Europe.

Citations

  1. [1]

    Version 1.3.66 of the Grok app was released on April 21, 2026.

    "on April 21, 2026"
  2. [2]

    A user claim that the app blocks account deletion without agreeing to a new privacy policy is refuted by external analysis.

    "- The smoking gun claim that users are blocked from deleting their accounts without agreeing to a new privacy policy is refuted by PCMag"
  3. [3]

    Grok's average daily active users on mobile apps dropped by 12.5% worldwide between March and April 2026.

    "Forbes notes that Grok's average daily active users on mobile apps worldwide dropped by 12.5% (from 13.9 million to 12.2 million) between March and April 2026"
  4. [4]

    Analysis confirms that deleting an X account does not remove data already incorporated into the AI model's training set.

    "deleting your X account does not delete the data from the AI model"

Sources

17 references

Maxime Doussin, CTO at MWM

Maxime Doussin

CTO

Maxime Doussin is the CTO of MWM, where he leads engineering, data infrastructure, and the mobile-app market-intelligence platform. He writes MWM's weekly app trend analysis, drawing on proprietary ranking data covering millions of iOS and Android apps across 150+ countries.

This article is an independent editorial analysis. App names, trademarks, and brands mentioned are the property of their respective owners. Market data and rankings referenced are based on MWM's proprietary estimates.

Believe this article infringes your intellectual property? File a dispute