Market intelligence

Nebula: Spiritual Guidance v6.40.0 Sparks 'Scam' Accusations Over Broken Trials and Unauthorized Charges in June 2026

Spiritual Nebula Limited's v6.40.0 update to 'Nebula: Spiritual Guidance' has caused a user backlash, with the app's rating dropping from 4.48 to 3.54 stars. Users report unauthorized charges and non-functional trials, leading to widespread accusations of the app being a 'scam'.

2 min read
The dominant new themes revolve around users being charged without consent or constantly pressured for money, alongside core app features (like trials) failing to progress, leading to accusations of the app being a 'scam'.
Nebula: Spiritual Guidance
On this page
  1. Update Sparks Backlash
  2. Opaque Release Notes
  3. Billing and Trial Failures
  4. Sentiment Reversal
  5. A Pattern of Complaints
  6. Verdict

Key takeaways

  1. 01The v6.40.0 update, released June 8, 2026, coincided with the app's average rating falling by 0.94 stars.
  2. 02Users report new issues post-update, including unauthorized charges and trial features failing to progress.
  3. 03The publisher's release notes for v6.40.0 did not mention any changes to monetization or trial mechanics.
  4. 04Prior to the update, user sentiment for v6.39.0 was largely positive, praising the app's accuracy.
  5. 05Community forums show a history of billing complaints, suggesting the update may have exacerbated an existing problem.
  6. 06The app's significant audience, with nearly 95,000 downloads in 30 days, is now exposed to these critical issues.

Update Sparks BacklashLead

Spiritual Nebula Limited's June 8 update to Nebula: Spiritual Guidance, version 6.40.0, has triggered a severe user backlash over aggressive and allegedly unauthorized charges. This has caused the app's average rating1]sers give your app on the App Store and Google Play — a primary ranking signal and one of the biggest conversion drivers on your product page. to drop sharply from 4.48 to 3.54 stars.

Opaque Release NotesRelease Summary

The official release notes for version 6.40.0 on the App Store were generic, promising only "Enhanced application stability" and "Minor bug fixes." Spiritual Nebula Limited provided no transparency about changes to the app's payment systems or trial mechanics, which became the central point of user complaints after the update.[2]

Billing and Trial FailuresBreaking Changes

The most serious complaints concern monetization. Users on version 6.40.0 report being charged without consent and encountering broken trial features. One 1-star reviewer stated, "They just charged me $70 without me every agreeing to any of the purchases."

Another critical bug appears to be trial features failing to progress after payment. A user wrote, "I paid for the trial and after several days the free aura color is at 5% and the Free Palmistry reading is at 18%... Seems like a scam." A secondary issue emerged with an age gate discrepancy, where users under 18 could not use the app despite its 16+ rating on the App Store. These issues have led to direct accusations of deceptive practices.

Sentiment ReversalUser Reception

The sentiment shift is stark when compared to feedback on the previous version, 6.39.0. Before the update, reviews were largely positive, with users praising the app's value. Typical 5-star comments included, "I love nebula it’s the best app for astrology" and "The accuracy seems spot on it’s uncanny."

After the v6.40.0 release, the tone changed to warnings and frustration. A 1-star review on the new version reads, "They try to take money from your account constantly! And you never get anywhere you have to buy so much just to get one answer! Scam app."

A Pattern of ComplaintsRoot Cause

While the v6.40.0 update brought these issues to a head, evidence from community forums suggests a history of problematic billing practices. Complaints on Google and Apple help forums dating back to 2024 describe unauthorized recurring charges and difficulty canceling subscriptions.

A thread on the r/ScamCenter subreddit claims the app's fine print admits its readings are algorithm-generated, not from live psychics as marketing suggests, further fueling user distrust. Archived.

VerdictExpert Verdict

With nearly 95,000 downloads in the last 30 days on US iOS alone, the damage to Nebula's reputation could have a lasting financial impact. The publisher faces a critical choice: issue a transparent fix addressing the billing and trial bugs, or risk permanent brand damage and potential action from app store operators.

The lack of disclosure in the release notes, combined with the severity of the new complaints, suggests a fundamental breach of user trust. The company's next steps will determine if it can recover or will be defined by these accusations.

Citations

  1. [1]

    Following the release of version 6.40.0, the app's average rating dropped from 4.48 to 3.54 stars.

    "The app's average rating plummeted from 4.48 to 3.54 stars following the release of version 6.40.0."
  2. [2]

    Official release notes for v6.40.0 only mentioned vague improvements like 'Enhanced application stability' and 'Minor bug fixes'.

    "40.0 mentioned only "Enhanced application stability" and "Minor bug fixes," failing to disclose any changes to monetization or trial features."
  3. [3]

    A user on the new version reported paying for a trial, only for key features to remain non-functional.

    "I paid for the trial and after several days the free aura color is at 5% and the Free Palmistry reading is at 18%. I am not paying more if they cannot get the App to work. Seems like a scam."

Sources

25 references

Maxime Doussin, CTO at MWM

Maxime Doussin

CTO

Maxime Doussin is the CTO of MWM, where he leads engineering, data infrastructure, and the mobile-app market-intelligence platform. He writes MWM's weekly app trend analysis, drawing on proprietary ranking data covering millions of iOS and Android apps across 150+ countries.

This article is an independent editorial analysis. App names, trademarks, and brands mentioned are the property of their respective owners. Market data and rankings referenced are based on MWM's proprietary estimates.

Believe this article infringes your intellectual property? File a dispute