User Acquisition

Organic Installs

Also known asOrganic AcquisitionUnattributed InstallsOrganic Users

App installs that come without direct paid advertising — App Store search, browse, web referrals, word-of-mouth, brand searches.

MWM data

State of April 2026

Median organic-install share

61.6%

Half of measurable apps source MORE than this fraction of installs from organic channels

Top-25% organic share

77.0%

Above-average organic dependence — strong ASO + brand awareness

Bottom-25% organic share

35.6%

Paid-UA-heavy apps — gaming and acquisition-driven categories

Median organic-SEARCH share

52.3%

Share of installs from App Store keyword search (the pure ASO signal)

Key takeaways

  1. 01Organic installs = unpaid acquisition: App Store search, browse / featured, web referrals, brand search, word-of-mouth.
  2. 02Healthy paid UA generates "organic uplift" — every $1 of paid often drives $0.20-0.50 of organic via increased brand awareness.
  3. 03Organic share of total installs varies wildly: utility apps often 60-80% organic; paid-UA-heavy gaming often 10-30%.

Organic installs are app installs that came without direct paid advertising. The major organic sources:

The median measurable iOS app sources 61.5% of installs organically, with App Store keyword search alone (the pure-ASO signal) contributing 51.9% of total installs. That's higher than most operators assume, and the headline reason ASO compounds: every paid install you make also lifts your search-rank position, which then drives more organic installs. The split varies dramatically by category — Games sit at 40% organic, every non-game parent category clusters between 66-72%.

Organic share varies wildly

Organic uplift from paid UA: a healthy paid UA program generates more than just paid installs. The ads themselves create awareness; users who see ads but don't install immediately may install organically days or weeks later (via brand search, App Store search, friend recommendation). The phenomenon is called "organic uplift" and typically runs $0.20-0.50 of incremental organic installs per $1 of paid spend. This makes paid UA more efficient than pure attribution suggests — and means cutting paid UA also reduces organic.

Measuring organic precisely is hard

Organic install channels — what each contributes

ChannelVolume potentialOptimization lever
App Store / Play Store searchHigh for keyword-targeted appsASO — title / subtitle / keyword field / description
Browse / featured / chartsHigh for ranked appsChart position, editorial features, ASO icon + screenshots
Web → Store referralsMediumSEO blog content, landing pages, deferred deep linking
Brand search (direct intent)Medium-highBrand campaigns, PR, content marketing
Word-of-mouth + referralsHigh for viral productsReferral program, network effects, share mechanics
Cross-promotion (own apps)Medium for multi-app publishersCross-app banners, account linking, bundled offers
Editorial (Today tab, Editor's Choice)Spikes when featuredApp quality + Apple / Google editorial relationships

Organic share varies wildly by category (10-25% for hyper-casual games, 60-80% for utilities, 40-70% for messaging at scale). Most apps under-invest in ASO and over-invest in paid UA relative to long-term unit economics — organic installs have zero marginal cost and compound.

Distribution of organic-install share across the catalogEach bar shows how many apps source that range of installs organically (no paid attribution). Apps with high organic share tend to be utility / productivity / strong-brand consumer apps; apps with low organic share are paid-UA-dependent (most casual games, post-launch consumer apps).01.3K2.5K3.8K5K<20%: 1,13220-40%: 1,77440-60%: 1,96760-75%: 2,32975-90%: 2,77990-100%: 182Strong-organic tier<20%20-40%40-60%60-75%75-90%90-100%Organic install share
Distribution of organic-install share across the catalog — US iOS apps with ≥500 d30 downloads and ≥100 daily installs on May 27, 2026 (MWM channel attribution), State of April 2026.

The distribution skews right — most catalog apps are 60%+ organic. The "<20% organic" bucket is small (~1,100 apps) and dominated by aggressive paid-UA gaming. The "75-90% organic" tier is the dense modal bucket — typical utility apps, productivity tools, content apps that monetize via subscriptions or ads but acquire mostly via ASO + brand. The 90%+ tail is small because some paid activity is almost always present (Apple Search Ads on brand terms, retargeting).

Organic-install share by category (US iOS, MWM)

CategoryMedian organic shareMedian organic-search share
Social & Communication71.5%64.7%
Productivity & Tools68.8%63.3%
Media & Entertainment66.7%59.3%
Lifestyle & Well-being66.7%62.0%
Education & Knowledge66.4%61.3%
Game39.5%25.7%

The category split confirms what UA teams already feel but rarely measure precisely: Games are paid-UA-dependent (40% organic median), while every other parent category sources 66-72% of installs organically. The implication for non-game apps: invest in ASO infrastructure, because the median app earns about 1 install via search for every 2 installs total.

Quick answers

What counts as organic installs in a mobile app?

Installs that came without direct paid advertising. Major sources: App Store search (user searched a keyword), App Store browse / featured (chart visibility), web referrals (clicked from search engines / social / blog), brand search (user searched your brand name), word-of-mouth and referrals.

What is a good organic share of total installs?

Category-dependent. Utility apps often 60-80% organic. Subscription consumer apps 30-50%. Hyper-casual games 10-25% (paid UA dominates). Mid-core / mature gaming brands 25-50% (brand awareness). Social / messaging at scale 40-70% (network effects). Compare to your own historical trend and category peers — absolute "good" depends entirely on category.

Does paid UA increase organic installs?

Yes — typically $0.20-0.50 of organic uplift per $1 of paid spend. Paid ads create brand awareness; users who see ads but don't install immediately may install organically days or weeks later via brand search, App Store search, friend recommendation. This makes paid UA more efficient than pure attribution suggests — and cutting paid UA reduces organic too. Rigorous measurement of paid-vs-organic requires incrementality testing.

Back to glossary