Attribution & Measurement

View-Through Attribution

Also known asVTAImpression-Based Attribution

An attribution mechanism that credits installs to ads the user SAW but did not click, within a short window (typically 1-24 hours).

Key takeaways

  1. 01View-through attribution credits installs from ad impressions (not clicks) within a short window (typically 1-24 hours).
  2. 02Much weaker signal than click-through — the user saw the ad but didn't engage, so causal link is less certain.
  3. 03Used as tiebreaker when no click attribution applies; rarely as primary attribution mechanism.

View-through attribution credits installs to ads the user saw (an impression) but did not click, within a short window (typically 1-24 hours, sometimes up to 7 days for premium video). It's the impression-level counterpart to click-through attribution. The premise: an ad can build awareness or intent even without a click, and that awareness can drive a later install through organic channels (App Store search, brand search).

Why view-through is weaker signal

  • No active engagement — the user saw the ad but didn't tap or interact. They may not even consciously remember seeing it.
  • High false-positive rate — many "view-through" installs would have happened anyway from organic channels. The ad just happened to be present in the user's recent history.
  • Short window for a reason — view-through windows are typically 1-24 hours (vs 7-30 days for click-through) specifically because longer windows accumulate more spurious matches.

When view-through attribution is useful

Limitations and pitfalls

For most mobile UA programs, click-through attribution is the operational source of truth. View-through is a secondary signal used selectively for brand campaign measurement and as a tiebreaker.

Quick answers

What is view-through attribution?

View-through attribution credits installs to ads the user SAW (an impression) but did NOT click, within a short window (typically 1-24 hours). The impression-level counterpart to click-through attribution. Premise: an ad can build awareness even without a click. Much weaker signal than click-through because there's no active engagement.

Why is view-through attribution weaker than click-through?

Three reasons. (1) **No active engagement** — the user saw the ad but didn't interact, so the causal link is less certain. (2) **High false-positive rate** — many "view-through" installs would have happened anyway from organic channels; the ad just happened to be present in user history. (3) **Short window for a reason** — view-through windows are 1-24 hours specifically because longer windows accumulate spurious matches.

Should I use view-through attribution in my mobile UA?

As a secondary signal, yes — useful for brand-campaign measurement and as a tiebreaker when no click attribution applies. As your primary attribution mechanism, no — too noisy for performance UA optimization. Most mature MMPs configure click-through as primary and view-through only as fallback. CTV / video-heavy programs benefit more from view-through than performance UA programs.

Back to glossary